Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 19:01:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 660BB5E596D73ECF8D122DBCEB8CEDC18D15DF0FD37D02B6242B60F5F82CC431
Participant Details

Original Note:

The account in the screenshot is clearly satirical and is labelled as such, so it is moot to refute a claim that is evidently a joke at her expense. She also presents no compelling evidence of misogynistic behaviour. https://x.com/politicoforyou?s=21&t=Mi-vRhM-MFv5a_ANZEbkbQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862205324616241387
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 660BB5E596D73ECF8D122DBCEB8CEDC18D15DF0FD37D02B6242B60F5F82CC431
  • createdAtMillis - 1732820515441
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1862205324616241387660BB5E596D73ECF8D122DBCEB8CEDC18D15DF0FD37D02B6242B60F5F82CC431