Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-29 01:44:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFE0F4FAA6F592D7C146E7A5D00509B7740162DDA2E0B7D266169DBCCD872677
Participant Details

Original Note:

O veto foi em um dispositivo que previa a manutenção dos dados por dez anos após o cumprimento integral da pena. Ou seja: “A extensão do prazo para além do período de cumprimento da pena, viola princípios constitucionais, como a proporcionalidade e o devido processo legal”. https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2024/11/28/sancionado-o-acesso-publico-a-dados-de-condenados-por-crimes-sexuais

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862185996940464276
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFE0F4FAA6F592D7C146E7A5D00509B7740162DDA2E0B7D266169DBCCD872677
  • createdAtMillis - 1732844686853
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1862185996940464276EFE0F4FAA6F592D7C146E7A5D00509B7740162DDA2E0B7D266169DBCCD872677