Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 16:03:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 599FF88024806D7C453227392D01029C42ADE06F2B7CBAAE22D94E928F1F473C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The op leaves out any information as to why the decision was made. If you read this article to the end it clearly states why. This is what they mean by pushing a false narrative https://apnews.com/article/judge-blocks-overtime-pay-biden-rule-8469c6980f9305c60f1670ed1d8362e2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862149805277094047
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 599FF88024806D7C453227392D01029C42ADE06F2B7CBAAE22D94E928F1F473C
  • createdAtMillis - 1732809817002
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1862149805277094047599FF88024806D7C453227392D01029C42ADE06F2B7CBAAE22D94E928F1F473C