Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 18:19:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 805F668E0480C545B6147DBA7DE9F7D3CFA46E4131561E11B15FA6E9DBA71E1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post presents an unverified claim as fact. The proposed model for post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a hypothesis, currently unsupported by research or clinical evidence, and at odds with known (post-)exertional abnormalities in ME/CFS and some long covid patients. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-44432-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862127791770333486
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 805F668E0480C545B6147DBA7DE9F7D3CFA46E4131561E11B15FA6E9DBA71E1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1732817956236
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1862127791770333486805F668E0480C545B6147DBA7DE9F7D3CFA46E4131561E11B15FA6E9DBA71E1C