Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-29 08:04:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71DC47C259E2D994179A040B4EE432EA2CAA7BAC99A61E73DA2EF02F5F240921
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post presents an unverified claim as fact. The proposed model for post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a hypothesis, currently unsupported by research or clinical evidence, and at odds with known (post-)exertional abnormalities in ME/CFS and some long covid patients. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-44432-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862127791770333486
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71DC47C259E2D994179A040B4EE432EA2CAA7BAC99A61E73DA2EF02F5F240921
  • createdAtMillis - 1732867467517
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186212779177033348671DC47C259E2D994179A040B4EE432EA2CAA7BAC99A61E73DA2EF02F5F240921