Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 17:09:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DE8AB03FD5D3C33F6817D4FC7D1670F5B233D9605121F6DADCF7C89D2774E61
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post presents an unverified claim as fact. The proposed model for post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a hypothesis, currently unsupported by research or clinical evidence, and at odds with known (post-)exertional abnormalities in ME/CFS and some long covid patients. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-44432-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862127791770333486
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DE8AB03FD5D3C33F6817D4FC7D1670F5B233D9605121F6DADCF7C89D2774E61
  • createdAtMillis - 1732813796835
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18621277917703334864DE8AB03FD5D3C33F6817D4FC7D1670F5B233D9605121F6DADCF7C89D2774E61