Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 17:06:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39E68389299081F2CD2912E9B3EFD183DC5725E4E09A4E629B9946FB44EE102B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post presents an unverified claim as fact. The proposed model for post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a hypothesis, currently unsupported by research or clinical evidence, and at odds with known (post-)exertional abnormalities in ME/CFS and some long covid patients. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-44432-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862127791770333486
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39E68389299081F2CD2912E9B3EFD183DC5725E4E09A4E629B9946FB44EE102B
  • createdAtMillis - 1732813566736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186212779177033348639E68389299081F2CD2912E9B3EFD183DC5725E4E09A4E629B9946FB44EE102B