Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-29 04:45:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F338F09F837F1241934B7E032C5F2908A1A01124DE1EEC785CDCB55CBF4CABD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note suggests the post is misleading and seems to want to gloss over how only one candidate reached out for this interview, trying to equivocate that they were both rejected. Only one campaign reached out, and only one was rejected. That's all the post says.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861903919368290785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F338F09F837F1241934B7E032C5F2908A1A01124DE1EEC785CDCB55CBF4CABD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1732855531913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861903919368290785F338F09F837F1241934B7E032C5F2908A1A01124DE1EEC785CDCB55CBF4CABD5