Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 02:58:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EED1D10F9FE46CDC3D5D47DBFC4970C0CBE057154500F0BDBBF5AB4035F7E96F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note suggests the post is misleading and seems to want to gloss over how only one candidate reached out for this interview, trying to equivocate that they were both rejected. Only one campaign reached out, and only one was rejected. That's all the post says.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861903919368290785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EED1D10F9FE46CDC3D5D47DBFC4970C0CBE057154500F0BDBBF5AB4035F7E96F
  • createdAtMillis - 1732762728769
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861903919368290785EED1D10F9FE46CDC3D5D47DBFC4970C0CBE057154500F0BDBBF5AB4035F7E96F