Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 09:36:09 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47C87AC5FCD4AF4DD5103A0D31740E81C339F65F133DA7DB952DB79615F8FD44
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note suggests the post is misleading and seems to want to gloss over how only one candidate reached out for this interview, trying to equivocate that they were both rejected. Only one campaign reached out, and only one was rejected. That's all the post says.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861903919368290785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47C87AC5FCD4AF4DD5103A0D31740E81C339F65F133DA7DB952DB79615F8FD44
  • createdAtMillis - 1732786569366
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186190391936829078547C87AC5FCD4AF4DD5103A0D31740E81C339F65F133DA7DB952DB79615F8FD44