Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 05:40:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F62ECE94101CD8FCE1971110CEB0A53D69F505EDE342D674C4DBB977CBFF949B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The cn added has linked to a unverified, unqualified, un pier reviewed document that doesn't explain where their evidence was gathered, or who funded the "research" To put it simply, it's probably a AI produced lie, done by the op, or one of her mate's https://openknowledge.fao.org

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861894568750289369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F62ECE94101CD8FCE1971110CEB0A53D69F505EDE342D674C4DBB977CBFF949B
  • createdAtMillis - 1732772430346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861894568750289369F62ECE94101CD8FCE1971110CEB0A53D69F505EDE342D674C4DBB977CBFF949B