Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 12:54:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1933A4869987DAE067923FC61B91FAC13351792239D4CDE53477C55522EF40E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The cn added has linked to a unverified, unqualified, un pier reviewed document that doesn't explain where their evidence was gathered, or who funded the "research" To put it simply, it's probably a AI produced lie, done by the op, or one of her mate's https://openknowledge.fao.org

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861894568750289369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1933A4869987DAE067923FC61B91FAC13351792239D4CDE53477C55522EF40E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1732798462598
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18618945687502893691933A4869987DAE067923FC61B91FAC13351792239D4CDE53477C55522EF40E8