Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-01 13:55:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06F9B37CA89AF793BBAA7595D0E4D4CB021BC37E636666FAE16EF49700E4E4C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The cn added has linked to a unverified, unqualified, un pier reviewed document that doesn't explain where their evidence was gathered, or who funded the "research" To put it simply, it's probably a AI produced lie, done by the op, or one of her mate's https://openknowledge.fao.org

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861894568750289369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06F9B37CA89AF793BBAA7595D0E4D4CB021BC37E636666FAE16EF49700E4E4C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1733061338610
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 186189456875028936906F9B37CA89AF793BBAA7595D0E4D4CB021BC37E636666FAE16EF49700E4E4C8