Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-29 04:29:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1BF41EC01E5D9FDCFA1109483EDB5D87F107F42939759BB96F1BF2BBFFB7870A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study cited in the comments was carried out on undergraduates, and therefore does not offer a wide enough pool to use the generalisation of "women" as a whole, as is implied. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19085605/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861817939537678360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1BF41EC01E5D9FDCFA1109483EDB5D87F107F42939759BB96F1BF2BBFFB7870A
  • createdAtMillis - 1732854591606
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18618179395376783601BF41EC01E5D9FDCFA1109483EDB5D87F107F42939759BB96F1BF2BBFFB7870A