Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 18:30:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D2F499292EEB29F0FFD71A283F6301E870FC3C922EBCD64767359B368B55C0A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed CN has argumentative language, but correctly points out inaccuracies in what Crenshaw is saying. Would love to see an edit that merely stares the facts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861767675614986313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D2F499292EEB29F0FFD71A283F6301E870FC3C922EBCD64767359B368B55C0A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1732818631315
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861767675614986313D2F499292EEB29F0FFD71A283F6301E870FC3C922EBCD64767359B368B55C0A5