Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 14:16:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF5A29B7E2CB4346B2FA6C6D65C1D809EB7A461AB1B1295D3DD9003FAD392955
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed — as explained in the link, estimates were made of thr population before the 1990s: https://x.com/juice8882/status/1861688494009024996?t=0iXXWV83JrrBcxHZEZ1O6g&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861714191234560300
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DF5A29B7E2CB4346B2FA6C6D65C1D809EB7A461AB1B1295D3DD9003FAD392955
  • createdAtMillis - 1732716963781
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861714191234560300DF5A29B7E2CB4346B2FA6C6D65C1D809EB7A461AB1B1295D3DD9003FAD392955