Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 14:42:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9A6797468D9320CA4CBD210F037785F1DADB003E2C6C111ADDF95BDD8E4CD0D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed — as explained in the link, estimates were made of thr population before the 1990s: https://x.com/juice8882/status/1861688494009024996?t=0iXXWV83JrrBcxHZEZ1O6g&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861714191234560300
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9A6797468D9320CA4CBD210F037785F1DADB003E2C6C111ADDF95BDD8E4CD0D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1732718555782
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18617141912345603009A6797468D9320CA4CBD210F037785F1DADB003E2C6C111ADDF95BDD8E4CD0D0