Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 18:16:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3E6ED0B5A5E158816274CEA463B017D9EB4940EDE4CF5AF9A11A7F386D0323D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the article clearly says "scientists" and not specifically climate scientists. Of note is that the majority of "experts" on other side are not climate scientists either, most are not even. Please debate in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861557486538408032
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3E6ED0B5A5E158816274CEA463B017D9EB4940EDE4CF5AF9A11A7F386D0323D
  • createdAtMillis - 1732731394996
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861557486538408032F3E6ED0B5A5E158816274CEA463B017D9EB4940EDE4CF5AF9A11A7F386D0323D