Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 20:09:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C10821387A760724A00CD5A49A6B0C47646B8048D236CD8EE0F20F3C151205F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the article clearly says "scientists" and not specifically climate scientists. Of note is that the majority of "experts" on other side are not climate scientists either, most are not even. Please debate in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861557486538408032
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C10821387A760724A00CD5A49A6B0C47646B8048D236CD8EE0F20F3C151205F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1732824567099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861557486538408032C10821387A760724A00CD5A49A6B0C47646B8048D236CD8EE0F20F3C151205F9