Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 01:38:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55DF5EA05D33F5BB446CD21D58C4664750431F30A3C287EB8F620B9BC3BCB10B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the article clearly says "scientists" and not specifically climate scientists. Of note is that the majority of "experts" on other side are not climate scientists either, most are not even. Please debate in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861557486538408032
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55DF5EA05D33F5BB446CD21D58C4664750431F30A3C287EB8F620B9BC3BCB10B
  • createdAtMillis - 1732671500491
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186155748653840803255DF5EA05D33F5BB446CD21D58C4664750431F30A3C287EB8F620B9BC3BCB10B