Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 10:13:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the article clearly says "scientists" and not specifically climate scientists. Of note is that the majority of "experts" on other side are not climate scientists either, most are not even. Please debate in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861557486538408032
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186
  • createdAtMillis - 1732702427830
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18615574865384080324FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186