Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 12:32:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00C27C0A59616A6EFAE8E735353C940B558C6818EC34430C2B6AB6A176ECF82E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the article clearly says "scientists" and not specifically climate scientists. Of note is that the majority of "experts" on other side are not climate scientists either, most are not even. Please debate in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861557486538408032
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00C27C0A59616A6EFAE8E735353C940B558C6818EC34430C2B6AB6A176ECF82E
  • createdAtMillis - 1732710762636
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186155748653840803200C27C0A59616A6EFAE8E735353C940B558C6818EC34430C2B6AB6A176ECF82E