Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 07:00:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B897AC9390119CBD0185341E539AF39DCC92221D6959469D69D6E591ED42AD04
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study that made these claims was retracted https://x.com/LibertyEthics/status/1861504739281608722?t=ZvnT9yt2GndFwP-S2f0FeQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861537348015587521
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B897AC9390119CBD0185341E539AF39DCC92221D6959469D69D6E591ED42AD04
  • createdAtMillis - 1732777246350
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1861537348015587521B897AC9390119CBD0185341E539AF39DCC92221D6959469D69D6E591ED42AD04