Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 20:03:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7BF3EC81A94A9A588C0370635408E2BA0A2B260DDC7E8580EFA8ED6D7DFF4333
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study that made these claims was retracted https://x.com/LibertyEthics/status/1861504739281608722?t=ZvnT9yt2GndFwP-S2f0FeQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861537348015587521
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7BF3EC81A94A9A588C0370635408E2BA0A2B260DDC7E8580EFA8ED6D7DFF4333
  • createdAtMillis - 1732737827251
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18615373480155875217BF3EC81A94A9A588C0370635408E2BA0A2B260DDC7E8580EFA8ED6D7DFF4333