Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 14:46:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF41DF391476F8EAEEB8428FC21278C9CE671FE5A85E6DA8FA70AE044C116E24
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author misses a key point - what she is doing here is engagement baiting. She is not being “silenced” for mentioning Epstein, rather the post breaks Meta’s policy on engagement baiting. https://transparency.meta.com/en-gb/features/approach-to-ranking/content-distribution-guidelines/engagement-bait/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861535669060776067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF41DF391476F8EAEEB8428FC21278C9CE671FE5A85E6DA8FA70AE044C116E24
  • createdAtMillis - 1732718765434
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1861535669060776067AF41DF391476F8EAEEB8428FC21278C9CE671FE5A85E6DA8FA70AE044C116E24