Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 19:39:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C41E9749738B2C26ED1BA1A7F5007E4BF48A91943B9C68D4EB1AB405BEA918DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN while maybe in the opinion section this article was still reported in the WSJ. The original post includes opinion and provides accurate account of article. Note is arguing semantics and is unnecessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861452295541588002
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C41E9749738B2C26ED1BA1A7F5007E4BF48A91943B9C68D4EB1AB405BEA918DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1732649959407
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861452295541588002C41E9749738B2C26ED1BA1A7F5007E4BF48A91943B9C68D4EB1AB405BEA918DE