Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 20:25:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88CD45B25DA907AD69C9E5C743EF5C953A7545D4DE41EDDFA45259CF6F36858B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN while maybe in the opinion section this article was still reported in the WSJ. The original post includes opinion and provides accurate account of article. Note is arguing semantics and is unnecessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861452295541588002
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 88CD45B25DA907AD69C9E5C743EF5C953A7545D4DE41EDDFA45259CF6F36858B
  • createdAtMillis - 1732652734973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186145229554158800288CD45B25DA907AD69C9E5C743EF5C953A7545D4DE41EDDFA45259CF6F36858B