Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 17:52:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81F4B100599DD52A7143CFDB3EBFE90C27ACEDB1A14A61574E33E3E2BA7344A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN while maybe in the opinion section this article was still reported in the WSJ. The original post includes opinion and provides accurate account of article. Note is arguing semantics and is unnecessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861452295541588002
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 81F4B100599DD52A7143CFDB3EBFE90C27ACEDB1A14A61574E33E3E2BA7344A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1732643565395
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186145229554158800281F4B100599DD52A7143CFDB3EBFE90C27ACEDB1A14A61574E33E3E2BA7344A4