Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 19:55:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E23801A96B3365C5F4F05BC0303DF976B6A41AAF86C0CB33A72B8DA068CFAAD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN while maybe in the opinion section this article was still reported in the WSJ. The original post includes opinion and provides accurate account of article. Note is arguing semantics and is unnecessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861452295541588002
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E23801A96B3365C5F4F05BC0303DF976B6A41AAF86C0CB33A72B8DA068CFAAD
  • createdAtMillis - 1732650917490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18614522955415880025E23801A96B3365C5F4F05BC0303DF976B6A41AAF86C0CB33A72B8DA068CFAAD