Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 18:35:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B4F162621838352EFE1F307D600E54E291861E73040A03463EAF2000A4F334C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN while maybe in the opinion section this article was still reported in the WSJ. The original post includes opinion and provides accurate account of article. Note is arguing semantics and is unnecessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861452295541588002
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B4F162621838352EFE1F307D600E54E291861E73040A03463EAF2000A4F334C
  • createdAtMillis - 1732646146126
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18614522955415880020B4F162621838352EFE1F307D600E54E291861E73040A03463EAF2000A4F334C