Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 15:07:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8D7E5004629B8C21B14ED6C2DA3BD09B1DFA244C1BB2A186D63EAF478FDB2050
Participant Details

Original Note:

The quote attributed to Amnesty is incorrect and does not appear on their intervention or website. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/resources/amnesty-international-uks-third-party-intervention-supreme-court-appeal-case-women?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=awareness_education&utm_content=blog%2Cnews

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861422870418636998
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8D7E5004629B8C21B14ED6C2DA3BD09B1DFA244C1BB2A186D63EAF478FDB2050
  • createdAtMillis - 1732633632850
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18614228704186369988D7E5004629B8C21B14ED6C2DA3BD09B1DFA244C1BB2A186D63EAF478FDB2050