Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 19:06:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71CADB1DB9FE8FFFE4E7DABA702F092E3C51CE7DF56187F5E407F6CDD2D1B693
Participant Details

Original Note:

The quote attributed to Amnesty is incorrect and does not appear on their intervention or website. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/resources/amnesty-international-uks-third-party-intervention-supreme-court-appeal-case-women?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=awareness_education&utm_content=blog%2Cnews

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861422870418636998
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71CADB1DB9FE8FFFE4E7DABA702F092E3C51CE7DF56187F5E407F6CDD2D1B693
  • createdAtMillis - 1732734369490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186142287041863699871CADB1DB9FE8FFFE4E7DABA702F092E3C51CE7DF56187F5E407F6CDD2D1B693