Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 07:30:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFA1D69F3B81BAE434F97B262BF416D299285121C7C5EE3EA7E03CEC450A6F5B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article lacks evidence to support its claims. Yougov polling has no methodology available for this poll conducted in Nov 24. Without this information, the conclusions are speculative and unverifiable. The absence of transparency also raises concerns about potential bias. https://au.yougov.com/about/panel-methodology/australian-polling-council

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861307667853254773
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFA1D69F3B81BAE434F97B262BF416D299285121C7C5EE3EA7E03CEC450A6F5B
  • createdAtMillis - 1732606241013
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861307667853254773EFA1D69F3B81BAE434F97B262BF416D299285121C7C5EE3EA7E03CEC450A6F5B