Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 06:32:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F993301D4E65AFFBF29A51EA205B75FBD46449A7D9137F7E83B2696EE59E3DA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

報道機関が裏取りをしなかった例がいくつあったとしても、通常の報道で裏取りのコストをかけていないという証拠にはなりません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861269311241015368
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F993301D4E65AFFBF29A51EA205B75FBD46449A7D9137F7E83B2696EE59E3DA1
  • createdAtMillis - 1732602761688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861269311241015368F993301D4E65AFFBF29A51EA205B75FBD46449A7D9137F7E83B2696EE59E3DA1