Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 10:23:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0D7C4B481538BB06A3982DD738281E0FB97C4A34EF7C0C507FE9AE81A1D7405
Participant Details

Original Note:

報道機関が裏取りをしなかった例がいくつあったとしても、通常の報道で裏取りのコストをかけていないという証拠にはなりません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861269311241015368
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0D7C4B481538BB06A3982DD738281E0FB97C4A34EF7C0C507FE9AE81A1D7405
  • createdAtMillis - 1732616625192
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861269311241015368D0D7C4B481538BB06A3982DD738281E0FB97C4A34EF7C0C507FE9AE81A1D7405