Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 05:56:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DA9F5E69C707E8DBBCBA665F9EA120248D842C06EAA7578978373BF9FF933A2
Participant Details

Original Note:

報道機関が裏取りをしなかった例がいくつあったとしても、通常の報道で裏取りのコストをかけていないという証拠にはなりません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861269311241015368
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DA9F5E69C707E8DBBCBA665F9EA120248D842C06EAA7578978373BF9FF933A2
  • createdAtMillis - 1732600578217
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18612693112410153684DA9F5E69C707E8DBBCBA665F9EA120248D842C06EAA7578978373BF9FF933A2