Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 09:04:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18DCD579A893F5B285BEA7A5EB19303FE42A37BEAEF5EEDD360FA0E65E9DFA05
Participant Details

Original Note:

報道機関が裏取りをしなかった例がいくつあったとしても、通常の報道で裏取りのコストをかけていないという証拠にはなりません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861269311241015368
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18DCD579A893F5B285BEA7A5EB19303FE42A37BEAEF5EEDD360FA0E65E9DFA05
  • createdAtMillis - 1732611873864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186126931124101536818DCD579A893F5B285BEA7A5EB19303FE42A37BEAEF5EEDD360FA0E65E9DFA05