Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-29 01:32:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF7FF3C1D407E4EA0368A690E52304FDF99BE28FAC1A92C14C3D4A0D9AF82153
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN it was never claimed that the paper was peer-reviewed. Trevor's past funding is irrelevant; nearly all university professors in Canada of all political affiliations recieve government research funding. https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/apply-demande/background-renseignements/selecting_agency-choisir_organisme_subventionnaire-eng.aspx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1861244449860526270
participantId -
raterParticipantId - DF7FF3C1D407E4EA0368A690E52304FDF99BE28FAC1A92C14C3D4A0D9AF82153
createdAtMillis - 1732843933453
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1861244449860526270DF7FF3C1D407E4EA0368A690E52304FDF99BE28FAC1A92C14C3D4A0D9AF82153