Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 03:35:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65A3489502FED1DA880B3930B08AF43EF1DF28C30E54BB3F436565C313B188D2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN it was never claimed that the paper was peer-reviewed. Trevor's past funding is irrelevant; nearly all university professors in Canada of all political affiliations recieve government research funding. https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/apply-demande/background-renseignements/selecting_agency-choisir_organisme_subventionnaire-eng.aspx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1861244449860526270
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 65A3489502FED1DA880B3930B08AF43EF1DF28C30E54BB3F436565C313B188D2
createdAtMillis - 1732592153126
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 186124444986052627065A3489502FED1DA880B3930B08AF43EF1DF28C30E54BB3F436565C313B188D2