Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-25 22:29:29 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4B05A1F6CF6F362FF71E7D3F1977011E9A2CA3E02D5D9D8F0B2C9D4CF902AE6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is not entirely correct. The father did not lose custody and the linked source backs that up, saying they are a “Joint Managed Conservatorship” between the parents. The mother was simply named the primary parent for most decisions. https://t.co/sdgAAsKLFl

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861096749777236400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4B05A1F6CF6F362FF71E7D3F1977011E9A2CA3E02D5D9D8F0B2C9D4CF902AE6
  • createdAtMillis - 1732573769592
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861096749777236400D4B05A1F6CF6F362FF71E7D3F1977011E9A2CA3E02D5D9D8F0B2C9D4CF902AE6