Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 10:09:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D0E6E3143E8E0ADF71D781DCB355795ED17C797E8E81A62382F7CF9D0B1CEFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is not entirely correct. The father did not lose custody and the linked source backs that up, saying they are a “Joint Managed Conservatorship” between the parents. The mother was simply named the primary parent for most decisions. https://t.co/sdgAAsKLFl

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861096749777236400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D0E6E3143E8E0ADF71D781DCB355795ED17C797E8E81A62382F7CF9D0B1CEFD
  • createdAtMillis - 1732615757752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18610967497772364009D0E6E3143E8E0ADF71D781DCB355795ED17C797E8E81A62382F7CF9D0B1CEFD