Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 12:53:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FC92F13AE123F60A0D7F5E390AEC6BFF79B573C9E35FC54AEA6476C3595F4172
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a case of medical malpractice not related to the law. TX law states that removing fetal remains after a miscarriage is not legally an abortion TX law applies equally to drugs as it does to surgical procedures. There’s no legal reason to favor 1 over the other. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/hs/htm/hs.171.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861087496701960508
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FC92F13AE123F60A0D7F5E390AEC6BFF79B573C9E35FC54AEA6476C3595F4172
  • createdAtMillis - 1732625607428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861087496701960508FC92F13AE123F60A0D7F5E390AEC6BFF79B573C9E35FC54AEA6476C3595F4172