Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 00:23:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF31C552C7E9A42F7F6300961B669BE573D2D088425089C2730CDE0D82AC06D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a case of medical malpractice not related to the law. TX law states that removing fetal remains after a miscarriage is not legally an abortion TX law applies equally to drugs as it does to surgical procedures. There’s no legal reason to favor 1 over the other. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/hs/htm/hs.171.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1861087496701960508
participantId -
raterParticipantId - CF31C552C7E9A42F7F6300961B669BE573D2D088425089C2730CDE0D82AC06D1
createdAtMillis - 1732580584185
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1861087496701960508CF31C552C7E9A42F7F6300961B669BE573D2D088425089C2730CDE0D82AC06D1