Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-25 16:52:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7B3C9240EBDF5A0E58390F505951E4741470B3E4B2E2C43B2050B6E14659598
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a case of medical malpractice not related to the law. TX law states that removing fetal remains after a miscarriage is not legally an abortion TX law applies equally to drugs as it does to surgical procedures. There’s no legal reason to favor 1 over the other. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/hs/htm/hs.171.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861087496701960508
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7B3C9240EBDF5A0E58390F505951E4741470B3E4B2E2C43B2050B6E14659598
  • createdAtMillis - 1732553523721
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1861087496701960508C7B3C9240EBDF5A0E58390F505951E4741470B3E4B2E2C43B2050B6E14659598