Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-25 17:46:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C244FBE6580E8E8A036FFAFEE0911B3909144E2534C8D22E5D52FCBD2382ED4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a case of medical malpractice not related to the law. TX law states that removing fetal remains after a miscarriage is not legally an abortion TX law applies equally to drugs as it does to surgical procedures. There’s no legal reason to favor 1 over the other. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/hs/htm/hs.171.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1861087496701960508
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C244FBE6580E8E8A036FFAFEE0911B3909144E2534C8D22E5D52FCBD2382ED4
  • createdAtMillis - 1732556799441
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18610874967019605081C244FBE6580E8E8A036FFAFEE0911B3909144E2534C8D22E5D52FCBD2382ED4