Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 12:13:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71A9DFBACF0FC9E874940A1A233BAE00F77D717278B1292C39D7FEB387737AAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Au NNN - De fait, il ne s'agit pas d'un retour à pré-2014 par un changement de procédure pénale, mais d'un retour pré-1893, date d'introduction du délit lui-même. Il s'agit donc bien de la suppression d'un délit, et d'un retour en arrière de plus d'un siècle, et non de 10 ans https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/article_jo/JORFARTI000029754420

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1861027864272900543
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 71A9DFBACF0FC9E874940A1A233BAE00F77D717278B1292C39D7FEB387737AAE
createdAtMillis - 1732709630809
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 186102786427290054371A9DFBACF0FC9E874940A1A233BAE00F77D717278B1292C39D7FEB387737AAE