Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-25 10:39:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 155C6C646BC4FACBECB356AB905D996041D2948306492F910591DC1CC5478E27
Participant Details

Original Note:

The books referenced were not identified as ‘far-right’ or ‘white-supremacist’, but as examples of the types of mainstream content shared in online spaces that are known to be frequented by terrorist and extremist influencers and susceptible audiences. https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-03-08/HL6239/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1860969172626198877
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 155C6C646BC4FACBECB356AB905D996041D2948306492F910591DC1CC5478E27
createdAtMillis - 1732531198832
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1860969172626198877155C6C646BC4FACBECB356AB905D996041D2948306492F910591DC1CC5478E27