Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 06:10:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The books referenced were not identified as ‘far-right’ or ‘white-supremacist’, but as examples of the types of mainstream content shared in online spaces that are known to be frequented by terrorist and extremist influencers and susceptible audiences. https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-03-08/HL6239/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1860969172626198877
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2
createdAtMillis - 1732601449187
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18609691726261988770989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2