Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 23:32:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61646C566BE55EC8838795A342C694D191B486F060573448658BCA7F31ABBE10
Participant Details

Original Note:

Charges were not laid because "no charges were supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt" Not because allegations were false Also concerning re Hegseth's behaviour is his statement to police he did not remember the argument beside the pool despite being only "buzzed" https://www.npr.org/2024/11/21/nx-s1-5199630/police-report-gives-details-timeline-of-the-sexual-assault-claim-against-pete-hegseth

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860821167382352355
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61646C566BE55EC8838795A342C694D191B486F060573448658BCA7F31ABBE10
  • createdAtMillis - 1732491145429
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186082116738235235561646C566BE55EC8838795A342C694D191B486F060573448658BCA7F31ABBE10