Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 21:42:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F22B6E10BD1AFBD22FC4D4B9D5D31E4D71E183DEA371AFAB6AFA1D1180E7E9E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is a misrepresentation or missing important context. As of now, many sources state the opposite. In addition, saying people voted "against" is a opinion or speculation. It may seen as incentivizng hatred by some. People vote for who they prefer. We encourage truth. https://www.cookpolitical.com/vote-tracker/2024/electoral-college https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn5w9w160xdo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1860760292025610636
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F22B6E10BD1AFBD22FC4D4B9D5D31E4D71E183DEA371AFAB6AFA1D1180E7E9E7
createdAtMillis - 1732484522377
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1860760292025610636F22B6E10BD1AFBD22FC4D4B9D5D31E4D71E183DEA371AFAB6AFA1D1180E7E9E7